Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 60 of 112

Thread: Mining companies pushing for improved ute safety

  1. #31
    Registered User JZK25's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Sunshine Coast, Qld.
    Posts
    5,739
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnMcSandyAxe View Post
    What fantasy land is it you live in? Where can I buy a ticket? I've hit 3 roos in my hilux, I can't even begin to think what sort of damage would have happened without a bullbar.

    They may cause damage to wildlife, maybe thats the point you're trying to make? If not, get your hand off it. I'd say most bullbars are thoroughly tested and certified, everything with a TJM/ARB/Ironman stamp on it certainly is.

    Were they wallabies?
    David Fraser - Automotive Historian!

    Quote Originally Posted by bigmuz View Post
    You can't polish a turd but you can put 600hp in it and laugh your fucking arse off coming past someone sideways at Powercruise.

  2. #32
    Hurry The Fuck Up bigmuz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Eastern Australia
    Posts
    4,664
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnMcSandyAxe View Post
    What fantasy land is it you live in? Where can I buy a ticket? I've hit 3 roos in my hilux, I can't even begin to think what sort of damage would have happened without a bullbar.

    They may cause damage to wildlife, maybe thats the point you're trying to make? If not, get your hand off it. I'd say most bullbars are thoroughly tested and certified, everything with a TJM/ARB/Ironman stamp on it certainly is.
    Ancap covers vehicle damage now? I thought it was occupant safety.

  3. #33
    Hurry The Fuck Up bigmuz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Eastern Australia
    Posts
    4,664
    I am going to take the word of the people who run the tests over you btw.

    http://www.ancap.com.au/faqs

    Does the fitment of bullbars (manufacturer endorsed or otherwise) to a vehicle effect its ANCAP safety rating?ANCAP does not test vehicles with bullbars fitted but it is expected that a bullbar would affect the performance in the ANCAP frontal offset test. In most cases they would be adverse effects because, with modern vehicles, the front crumple zone is usually an optimum design for this severity of crash and a bullbar would change the crumple characteristics away from this optimum.

    The fitment of bullbars also provides the possibility of additional risk of injury to pedestrians. From 2012, the ANCAP Road Map sets out minimum requirements for pedestrian protection in order for a vehicle to receive an overall rating of 5 stars ("high seat" vehicles do not have to meet this until 2014). Extra pedestrian protection tests would need to be conducted to show that these minimum requirements are met with a bullbar fitted.

  4. #34
    Registered User gat5rodeo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    3,680
    Santos are reportedly bringing this in as well. My mob is having to pension off some hiluxs and patrols because they don't have stability control, side airbags etc etc

    It's good in theory, costs a fucking fortune for all the smaller companies that contract to the bigger guys

    I can't wait to see how the new amaroks hold up to site use, because I wouldn't mind buying one in the next few years

  5. #35
    Fuckin loose cunt aye fat910's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Townsville
    Posts
    635
    I bet continually maintaining Amarok's will be cheaper in the long run, especially underground vehicles....
    They say i know fuck nothing, but i know fuck all!

  6. #36
    Real life axe man JohnMcSandyVag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    1,100
    Quote Originally Posted by JZK25 View Post
    Were they wallabies?
    Note the part where I said "roos"

    Quote Originally Posted by bigmuz View Post
    Bullbars are a joke.

    They cause as much damage as they prevent.

    And exactly how many extra points do you get in ANCAP for having an untested and uncertified bullbar out the front?
    Quote Originally Posted by bigmuz View Post
    Ancap covers vehicle damage now? I thought it was occupant safety.
    Ancap has nothing to do with you making the moronic statement "bullbars are a joke, they cause as much damage as they cause". If this was the case my wife and I would both be laying by the side of the road with broken spines after colliding with said kangaroos.

    Yes they probably do effect the crumple zones in a front impact with something solid, vs wildlife they are a however a life saver. If you don't believe in bullbars you clearly haven't traveled our outback much and I feel really sorry for you Our trips would have been cut very short if not for the bullbar, I have no doubt about that.
    Quote Originally Posted by theblacktexta View Post
    I've always had a thing for girls in wheelchairs. Dont need to spend $$ on exotic cocktails, - just need to apply the handbrake.

  7. #37
    Interested bystander
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    348
    Quote Originally Posted by bigmuz View Post
    I am going to take the word of the people who run the tests over you btw.

    Does the fitment of bullbars (manufacturer endorsed or otherwise) to a vehicle effect its ANCAP safety rating?ANCAP does not test vehicles with bullbars fitted but it is expected that a bullbar would affect the performance in the ANCAP frontal offset test. In most cases they would be adverse effects because, with modern vehicles, the front crumple zone is usually an optimum design for this severity of crash and a bullbar would change the crumple characteristics away from this optimum.

    The fitment of bullbars also provides the possibility of additional risk of injury to pedestrians. From 2012, the ANCAP Road Map sets out minimum requirements for pedestrian protection in order for a vehicle to receive an overall rating of 5 stars ("high seat" vehicles do not have to meet this until 2014). Extra pedestrian protection tests would need to be conducted to show that these minimum requirements are met with a bullbar fitted.

    http://www.ancap.com.au/faqs
    It seems they have not done any detailed analysis but rather are speculating saying the crumple zone is optimum design. Optimum design for the test perhaps. If animals are shaped like the block in the offset test and the relative velocity is the same as the test then life will be sweet and everyone can feel safe.

  8. #38
    Registered User JZK25's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Sunshine Coast, Qld.
    Posts
    5,739
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnMcSandyAxe View Post
    Note the part where I said "roos"





    Ancap has nothing to do with you making the moronic statement "bullbars are a joke, they cause as much damage as they cause". If this was the case my wife and I would both be laying by the side of the road with broken spines after colliding with said kangaroos.

    Yes they probably do effect the crumple zones in a front impact with something solid, vs wildlife they are a however a life saver. If you don't believe in bullbars you clearly haven't traveled our outback much and I feel really sorry for you Our trips would have been cut very short if not for the bullbar, I have no doubt about that.

    Why would a bullbar bolted to the front of your car prevent you from having a broken spine? Were you in a Series 2 Landrover?
    David Fraser - Automotive Historian!

    Quote Originally Posted by bigmuz View Post
    You can't polish a turd but you can put 600hp in it and laugh your fucking arse off coming past someone sideways at Powercruise.

  9. #39
    later
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Queanbeyan, Australia
    Posts
    4,618
    Most of the big name bullbars ARE tested and certified airbag compatible. Some however aren't, my sister,nopics, found this out with her Xtrail. The installer refused to touch any bar that wasn't airbag certified, which there were a couple. I'm talking proper bullbars, not ebay nudge bars.
    As for mines needing 5star rated vehicles, that's going to be norm in alot of industries soon, along with ULEV/ZEV emmision ratings. Look at London.

  10. #40
    門+心/你 :D smellytofu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    5,251
    Quote Originally Posted by Asteroid View Post
    I'm guessing we'll see some more superfluous electronic safety programs to get the points tally over the 5 star mark.
    No, rear seatbelt reminder warning buzzers. That's the biggest freebie point manufacturers can pick up easily. As is sticking sponge under the steering column which Subaru are well known to do in borderline cases.

  11. #41
    piss taker of the piss Uncle Arthur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    10,976
    The only vehicle occupant advantage a bullbar may have in a collision with a roo or similar is if it prevents the animal from coming over the bonnet and into the windscreen. Which is possible if the bullbar catches the animal but not all that likely.

    A bullbar will certainly protect the vehicle most times but, because of it's rigid design, will likely cause more shock to be transmitted to vehicle occupants, not less. But in reality the only likely injury to vehicle occupants is from an animal coming through the windscreen.

  12. #42
    Registered User samdumbert's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Everywhere
    Posts
    428
    Quote Originally Posted by fat910 View Post
    I bet continually maintaining Amarok's will be cheaper in the long run, especially underground vehicles....
    italics?

  13. #43
    Hurry The Fuck Up bigmuz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Eastern Australia
    Posts
    4,664
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnMcSandyAxe View Post
    Note the part where I said "roos"

    Ancap has nothing to do with you making the moronic statement "bullbars are a joke, they cause as much damage as they cause". If this was the case my wife and I would both be laying by the side of the road with broken spines after colliding with said kangaroos.

    Yes they probably do effect the crumple zones in a front impact with something solid, vs wildlife they are a however a life saver. If you don't believe in bullbars you clearly haven't traveled our outback much and I feel really sorry for you Our trips would have been cut very short if not for the bullbar, I have no doubt about that.
    Dig up stupid.

  14. #44
    BLING BLING PLAYA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    adelaide
    Posts
    4,414
    LOL where I work they just bought Chinese trucks and great walls because they bin them in 2 years.
    I design and sell the following:

    www.iqengineering.com.au
    -RB30 into GTR sump adapters
    -Engine mounts - urethane and perfect for all conversions
    -SR20 to RB25 bell housing conversions
    -Can do any 3D design and modelling at competitive rates.

    Coming Soon:
    Holden 5L 4 bolt main caps and full one piece girdle.
    Hydraulic tilt tray trailers, lowest approach angle in the industry, suspension, control it from your Android or Iphone....ETA 2 months

  15. #45
    Sup Kyle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Muswellbrook
    Posts
    4,732
    Connie at work got a new great wall, its suspension literally fell to pieces after 3 months on site.. worst piece if this ever

  16. #46
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Here, tomorrow I'll be There
    Posts
    944
    Quote Originally Posted by 260DET View Post
    The only vehicle occupant advantage a bullbar may have in a collision with a roo or similar is if it prevents the animal from coming over the bonnet and into the windscreen. Which is possible if the bullbar catches the animal but not all that likely.

    A bullbar will certainly protect the vehicle most times but, because of it's rigid design, will likely cause more shock to be transmitted to vehicle occupants, not less. But in reality the only likely injury to vehicle occupants is from an animal coming through the windscreen.
    Don't forget the bit where your vehicle still works after the accident. A dead vehicle can slowly and painfully lead to dead occupants in the absolute middle of no-where

    It's all good saying that utes and things need to be 5-star rated, mine utes do get swapped out every few years and for the purposes of using it as a ute there isn't that much difference between a ford a nissan a toyota and a VW. They all have seats and use diesel.

    If however you are a contractor on site with very specifically modified light vehicles to do a very specific job and are expected to have a much longer life expectancy this is going to be a right pain in the ass. Especially since there are no 5 star rated vehicles suitable to the task

  17. #47
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    30
    Yeah have been a lot of new rangers through work for BMA up here, no more bull-bars and spotlights, I haven't really looked if they have the ROPS

    I don't see how their cars having a 5 star ANCAP rating is going to help, they lift most of them and fit pretty average mud tyres which lead to them rolling around lie shit heaps

  18. #48
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    australia
    Posts
    686
    Toyota gives no fuck for mining companies, in reality Australia is about 2 percent of total hilux/landcruiser sales and of that mining companies are about 10 percent of sales.
    A lot of mining companies think they are way more important than they really are.

    When you buy as many vehicles as the UN and you say you are going to stop buying utes, then toyota will listen.
    Untill then they are just pissing into the wind.
    Quote Originally Posted by Smashed S15 Bloke View Post
    I'm a big unit.

  19. #49
    Fondles
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by dlux View Post
    Toyota gives no fuck for mining companies, in reality Australia is about 2 percent of total hilux/landcruiser sales and of that mining companies are about 10 percent of sales.
    A lot of mining companies think they are way more important than they really are.

    When you buy as many vehicles as the UN and you say you are going to stop buying utes, then toyota will listen.
    Untill then they are just pissing into the wind.
    You sure about that, Last year Toyota sold over 200,000 vehicles into the mining industry, I reckon they give many fucks.

  20. #50
    門+心/你 :D smellytofu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    5,251
    Quote Originally Posted by Eddie Munster View Post
    You sure about that, Last year Toyota sold over 200,000 vehicles into the mining industry, I reckon they give many fucks.
    +1. Think they give more than many think.

  21. #51
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    gold coast
    Posts
    200
    I look forward to a Caterpillar 797 speed-bump occupant safety test being incorporated into the ANCAP rating system.
    yes i have a car and a bike and a computer and some other shit... but why the fuck would i bother posting details about them here... are you retired? why do you care anyway?

  22. #52
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    4,266
    Quote Originally Posted by ova400 View Post
    I don't see how their cars having a 5 star ANCAP rating is going to help, they lift most of them and fit pretty average mud tyres which lead to them rolling around lie shit heaps
    That's what the ESP is for.

  23. #53
    Registered User Asteroid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Lapping freo.
    Posts
    3,103
    Quote Originally Posted by sean View Post
    Don't forget the bit where your vehicle still works after the accident. A dead vehicle can slowly and painfully lead to dead occupants in the absolute middle of no-where
    This is kind of important in much of this country. I can see bullbars and spotties remaining/ reappearing fairly soon.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim View Post
    the only decent six pot holden ever put in a car was the nissan RB30

  24. #54
    smilin' for the camera MRMOPARMAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Kangaroo flat!
    Posts
    6,407
    Quote Originally Posted by rj_astra View Post
    That's what the ESP is for.
    Some esp systems have a shitfit if you lift them and put big muddies and shit on them

  25. #55
    Busted Datsun monk_13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    100
    I'm looking forward to Rangers becoming the norm for 2 reasons.

    Free filters n shit and also laughs when all the dodgy old school LV mechs plug spotties and various other electics into spots they are not meant to and start frying the electrical system.
    Z33, S13 = Same fucking same... Damned POS Datsuns....

  26. #56
    pissed off irsa76's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Queanbeyan
    Posts
    2,403
    Quote Originally Posted by rj_astra View Post
    That's what the ESP is for.
    Quote Originally Posted by MRMOPARMAN View Post
    Some esp systems have a shitfit if you lift them and put big muddies and shit on them
    ESP is calibrated for a specific tyre/suspension combination. Change the combination beyond a certain amount and ESP actually becomes a liability. That's why FPV took so long to introduce ESP on a couple of models after Ford had it on regular Falcons.

  27. #57
    pissed off irsa76's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Queanbeyan
    Posts
    2,403
    Quote Originally Posted by monk_13 View Post
    I'm looking forward to Rangers becoming the norm for 2 reasons.

    Free filters n shit and also laughs when all the dodgy old school LV mechs plug spotties and various other electics into spots they are not meant to and start frying the electrical system.
    Not hard to fix the electrical issue, they just run a separate fuse box not connected to CAN-BUS, can also set up a programmable module to control additional equipment.
    Mercedes does it on their vans, either as standard or as an option.

  28. #58
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    australia
    Posts
    686
    I think you over estimate the smarts of some of the LV fitters, why run a wire back to the dedicated fuse panel when you can just hook it into these twisted wires here.Its ok one of them is red so it should have power
    Quote Originally Posted by Smashed S15 Bloke View Post
    I'm a big unit.

  29. #59
    pissed off irsa76's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Queanbeyan
    Posts
    2,403
    Yeah, considering how much I've cost "professional auto electricians" after finding and fixing their fuck ups under warranty I should know better. FFS I'm a colour blind mechanic and I can still do better work then some of these idiots.
    By cost I mean the dealer has sent the bill to the dickhead who originally did the work. Many laughs over that one, in one case the prick still has a grudge against me.

  30. #60
    Below Me St00ge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    \x/estside
    Posts
    2,811
    Quote Originally Posted by smellytofu View Post
    +1. Think they give more than many think.
    Yup I reckon Stanley Perron gives many fucks...
    Ride -=- e36 m3 <> Mods -=- brake dust

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •