Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Laser speed detection questions

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by tinkerbell
    :rotflol: :rotflol: :rotflol: :rotflol:

    see, you assumed the person had an accident, LOLOLOL!
    Normally when some hits something its called an accident
    Automotive Superstore

    Little Real Estate Bondi

    Comment


      #32
      "double ton"?

      in cricket a double ton = 200 runs

      hitting the double ton on a freeway = 200km/h

      sorry, i thought it was common parlance? sorry.

      Comment


        #33
        kabab said: cars and roads are capable at traveling faster 110km/h

        tinkerbell said: yes, as proved by the person doing 200km/h on the F3

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by oldcorollas
          if you crash, it means you couldn't stop in time.
          if you are going slower, you can stop easier, so are more likely to stop in time.
          if you are going slower but still can't stop in time, the damage is smaller
          there is no mystery, except why people continue to die on roads for no reason.....

          it is very uncommon for a crash to occur due to mechanical failure.
          We are talking about straight flat roads.. for the most part you come come to a stop without brakes and not hit anything...

          If someone can't drive a car in a straight line at 140km/h perhaps they shouldn't have a license to begin with?
          Automotive Superstore

          Little Real Estate Bondi

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by kabab
            We are talking about straight flat roads.. for the most part you come come to a stop without brakes and not hit anything...
            e.g. hit a kangaroo?

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by tinkerbell
              kabab said: cars and roads are capable at traveling faster 110km/h

              tinkerbell said: yes, as proved by the person doing 200km/h on the F3
              Oh ffs stop confusing me woman!

              Back to the kitchen
              Automotive Superstore

              Little Real Estate Bondi

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by tinkerbell
                e.g. hit a kangaroo?
                You are pretty fucked eitherway..

                Less time on road less change to hit a roo??
                Automotive Superstore

                Little Real Estate Bondi

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by kabab
                  Less time on road less change to hit a roo??
                  LOL!

                  yeah, fair point!!!

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by Herve Villecha
                    I've only used a LIDAR for a short time but it was simply a matter of pointing the thing in the direction of the car you're targetting, locking the red dot onto it and holding the trigger for 3 seconds to get the speed reading.

                    It's hardly a task requiring a sniper.

                    But is it a 100% accurate reading?

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Originally posted by tinkerbell
                      chance of injury/death in accident increased by 50*%

                      = 100 times better?

                      i think your maths might be slightly out?
                      *it is actually much higher, but dont know exactly. but 100-140 must be HEAPS, if 100-110 is 21% increase**
                      **http://www.transport.sa.gov.au/rss/c...sues/speed.htm
                      Did you actually read the link you quoted???! :w:

                      Apart from it being from a highly unbiased website(!) it is talking about crash energy, not the chance of injury/death like you are alluding to.

                      Comment


                        #41
                        Also if you are so worried about the massive increase in the risk of injury/death in going from 100 to 140 then I suggest you don't travel along any sections of the Pacific Highway (or other roads) where it is signposted at 100km/h but it is single lane with no barrier between the two opposing directions.

                        Comment


                          #42
                          Originally posted by oldcorollas
                          if you crash, it means you couldn't stop in time.
                          if you are going slower, you can stop easier, so are more likely to stop in time.
                          if you are going slower but still can't stop in time, the damage is smaller
                          there is no mystery, except why people continue to die on roads for no reason.....

                          it is very uncommon for a crash to occur due to mechanical failure.
                          People keep dieing because it has zero to do with speed limits and lots to do with the person operating the car. Speeding isn't the leading cause of accidents, it's lots of other reason why people crash.

                          Comment


                            #43
                            so

                            how do they "get the target in the middle" when its on the side of the car? do they swirve?

                            I know a time I got booked it was impossible for him to ping me for more than half a second. (it was round a bend, he was coming the other way)
                            Originally posted by psssi98
                            I'm not down for crossing swords in the mud. :p

                            Comment


                              #44
                              Waits for someone to mention the Autobarn in relation to max speeds and road fatalities VS distance KM traveled.
                              10.83 @ 125

                              Quickest stock exhaust manifold stud 2JZ in Aus.


                              Originally posted by cracka
                              Some conclusions empirically were that a large protruding ridge like a prolapsed arsehole around the runner was largely beneficial.

                              Comment


                                #45
                                Originally posted by a777
                                Did you actually read the link you quoted???! :w:

                                Apart from it being from a highly unbiased website(!) it is talking about crash energy, not the chance of injury/death like you are alluding to.
                                um, well, it states (in the next line after the 21% figure):

                                As speeds increase, serious injuries are usually found to increase at a faster rate than less serious injuries.
                                how is that not talking about "the chance of injury/death"

                                :knock:

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X