Originally posted by GTSBoy
A lot of partial answers above.
It is true that for the same tyre pressure and the same car weight, the contact patch area will be the same. So you would expect the amount of friction to be the same. But as there are not just frictional forces to consider, a wider tyre will usually be able to produce more grip, particularly when transversely loaded.
The soft rubber keys into the surface irregularities, so there is a mechanical grip component as well as simple surface friction.
What happens to the shape of the contact patch is critical in a couple of ways. Firstly, the wider the contact patch, then the shorter it is. What this means is that as the tyre revolves, the bit that gets flattened against the road undergoes less deformation (because a long contact patch has to be deformed more than a short one) and so the tyre will generate less heat from internal friction. This means that the tyre can be constructed with materials that don't have to operate at as high a temperature as one that sufferes more deflection. So in general, a wider tyre can use a stickier compound than a skinnier tyre and not overheat. There is more grip right there from the stickier compound. Taken to the extreme, stickier compounds get to the state of race slicks where the tyre is actually bonding itself to the road surface.
The other aspect of contact patch shape is that the force required to break a tyre free is somewhat dependant on the length of the contact patch in the direction that you are trying to break it free in. The wider tyre has more length in the transverse direction, so will tend to offer more grip for cornering at the expense of a loss of some grip for traction.
I remember when lower profile tyres first started coming out that the 65 series tyres were touted as having the most "square" contact patch and therefore offered the best mix of drive traction and cornering traction. Completely ignoring, of course, the fact that you might not want it that way on any car, let alone every car.
cheers
It is true that for the same tyre pressure and the same car weight, the contact patch area will be the same. So you would expect the amount of friction to be the same. But as there are not just frictional forces to consider, a wider tyre will usually be able to produce more grip, particularly when transversely loaded.
The soft rubber keys into the surface irregularities, so there is a mechanical grip component as well as simple surface friction.
What happens to the shape of the contact patch is critical in a couple of ways. Firstly, the wider the contact patch, then the shorter it is. What this means is that as the tyre revolves, the bit that gets flattened against the road undergoes less deformation (because a long contact patch has to be deformed more than a short one) and so the tyre will generate less heat from internal friction. This means that the tyre can be constructed with materials that don't have to operate at as high a temperature as one that sufferes more deflection. So in general, a wider tyre can use a stickier compound than a skinnier tyre and not overheat. There is more grip right there from the stickier compound. Taken to the extreme, stickier compounds get to the state of race slicks where the tyre is actually bonding itself to the road surface.
The other aspect of contact patch shape is that the force required to break a tyre free is somewhat dependant on the length of the contact patch in the direction that you are trying to break it free in. The wider tyre has more length in the transverse direction, so will tend to offer more grip for cornering at the expense of a loss of some grip for traction.
I remember when lower profile tyres first started coming out that the 65 series tyres were touted as having the most "square" contact patch and therefore offered the best mix of drive traction and cornering traction. Completely ignoring, of course, the fact that you might not want it that way on any car, let alone every car.
cheers
thanks very much gtsboy!

Comment