Statement of Claim - 4.5 years after an accident..WTF

[BundyBeej]

Sounds like the taxi insurance scheme is either up for renewal or has been audited and the claims manager is just chasing any possible recovery they can. I've had a look at a couple of taxi schemes in the last few years and they're shocking as far as claims go; so they're probably trying to tidy it up.

The value they're chasing is probably about 1/805 of their total claims value for the year.

[Lobster]

So what happened?

[The Schapelle Guru]

any updates?

[Speedah]

any updates?

I only posted the defence a few days ago...was told it could take weeks or months before a hearing date is set.

[Dogsballs]

i would of posted the letter back with "Not at this address"

[rolin7]

Just write a get fucked letter back with Wayne Besankos details at the bottom claiming it's a breach of section 52 of trade practices act.

HTH

[The Schapelle Guru]

any updates?

[The artist formerly known as Teenage Mutant Ninja ShitCunt 4 but is really RogerCordia NO SHIT!]

Where is this statue? Is it near the statue of liberty?

I think ya missing a 'T' :D

Its not a sculpture of limitation, its statute.

^ A line from seinfield.

[JESUS CHRIST]

Its not a sculpture of limitation, its statute.

^ A line from seinfield.

Hmmmmmm :huh:

- Plausible use of punctuation - almost correct, but the comma after 'limitation' infers a degree of aptitude that is not continued with 'its'. 'Its' being a commonly picked grammatical error on PF, i suspect you selected that and slipped up with the correct use of the said comma :knock:

- seinfeld - lack of capital 'S' infers Grade 2 spelling, however getting the 'i' after 'e' correct in such a word as seinfeld (sic) AND not spelling it with 'field' as the second syllable, displays some degree above normal Rodger Cordia style expectations.

You are slipping son.....

[Speedah]

any updates?

Went to court on Tuesday 2nd Feb for a Pre-trail review.
This was to see if we could settle out of court. I was not open to any negotiations so we are going back on the 30th March.

The driver of the taxi was not there..he didn’t have to be. The taxi company’s solicitor also told me they have a witness…which must be the passenger that was in the taxi.

Thing is the driver of the taxi and his passenger don’t have to be there for the actual hearing but I do. A written statement from them is supposedly good enough.

Pretty sure I’m going to lose and it will cost a lot more. It’s me versus two of them now. I’m a bit annoyed with my stubbornness that I didn’t come to an agreement on the day. The solicitor had 6 other cases and they all reached an agreement.

I will be able to see the statement of the witness on the 16th March..will be interesting what he has to say. (if it is actually him and not some mate of the taxi company).

[Shitbreak]

Good on you for sticking to this. Will be interested in the outcome.

[Dogsballs]

Dennis Denuto: It's the vibe of the thing, your Honour.

[ironhorse]

He was an Indian.

Id open my case and close my case with this . Sydney Indian taxi drivers are always at fault . They're fucked.

[rorge]

I am surprised no one has mentioned the damage to his vehicle in the photo is IMPOSSIBLE for you to have done by merging into him. The ONLY way he can get a scrape where he did and the way he did is if he has turned into your trailer, which he has no 'right' to do as your vehicle was well infront of his.

[BigJonWB]

I am surprised no one has mentioned the damage to his vehicle in the photo is IMPOSSIBLE for you to have done by merging into him. The ONLY way he can get a scrape where he did and the way he did is if he has turned into your trailer, which he has no 'right' to do as your vehicle was well infront of his.

^ this.