Moon landing conspiracy theorists - lend me your ears.

[lumpy]

There are bolides, micro meteorites and other junk whizzing around space that you can crash into (or more accurately they can crash into you) but space is so big (and the probes/satellites/space stations we currently have are so small) that the probability of a collision is quite low.

However once we get bigger and bigger installations into space (and the amount of space junk/debris we cause increases) then it's something that will need to be planned for.

[Lobster]

Don't think I have ever heard of one person say "You know, I believe that the moon landing was faked. But I believe that 9/11 was terrorists, that JFK was killed by Lee Harvey Oswald alone, Elvis is not alive, that Australia is not really a registered company of USA so Commonwealth Law does apply and that chemtrails are made up garbage"

These people never only believe one thing. They believe several. They also don't have the answer, just point out 1 or 2 points over and over again that don't make sense to them.

[Sturmovik]

There are bolides, micro meteorites and other junk whizzing around space that you can crash into (or more accurately they can crash into you) but space is so big (and the probes/satellites/space stations we currently have are so small) that the probability of a collision is quite low.

However once we get bigger and bigger installations into space (and the amount of space junk/debris we cause increases) then it's something that will need to be planned for.

And the amount of shit around the Earth today is far greater than in 1969

[BigMuz]

The thing about space is that there is quite a lot of it.

[E30is]

At 0.1m/s2 youd still get to 4000kmhr in about 3 hours. There isn't necessarily any substantial forces.

For reference thats roughly 100th a single G force

that was not how the voyage was made though was it....

[oioioioioi]

Of course not, it's an exaggeration in order to prove a point.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Walt Kowalski]

If you squint you can see Martin Bryants footprints on the moon.

[2JZR31]

cbfed reading 11ty pages but thought I would post this in case it had not been.

[Sturmovik]

[datso]

Indoctrination is an industry, its the world's main industry retarding the masses
into believing authoritive fighures into what we know is BS.

Disney Studios is still brain destroying our kids today nothing has changed
just the evidence, touched up videos and lies are justified with more lies.

Like the chings amusing claims of going to the moon its all patriotic propaganda

[Captiva Fan]

Disney Studios is still brain destroying our kids today nothing has changed

Yep, all those children believing a mouse can talk; straight from The Company's MK-Ultra playbook!

[yohoes]

Yep, all those children believing a mouse can talk; straight from The Company's MK-Ultra playbook!

The CIA sounds hilarious to work at during that time..

"Haha Bob you fell for it! Your coffee has a fuck-tonne of LSD in it!"

[XFJET]

like I said before ... with the moon landing .... find me a photographer that can put his DSLR in full manual mode use the same lens as the Astronauts used on the moon landing, cover the viewfinder and take the 1000 photos of things around their place then see if from the 1000 photos at least 100 are in focus

I'm looking at the poof presented to us which is photos and video, I give no fuck about technology and rocket scientists and other science behind it but when you have an astronaut in their fuckign suit where they can't even see a view finder (there was no view finder) and take photos of fucking amazing quality with the equipment they had I say it's fucking bullshit, they had no view finder, no autofocus and a pretty fucking wide lens which is fucking recipes for out of focus and under/over exposed photo's yet the fucking photos look tack sharp with a very small object in focus ... that is either fucking art or bullshit and I truly hope that before anyone makes a stupid comment they should take their SLR and turn it to manual, cover the view finder, turn autofocus off and take some family snaps, only then come back here and comment

[Billzilla]

like I said before ... with the moon landing .... find me a photographer that can put his DSLR in full manual mode use the same lens as the Astronauts used on the moon landing, cover the viewfinder and take the 1000 photos of things around their place then see if from the 1000 photos at least 100 are in focus

I'm looking at the poof presented to us which is photos and video, I give no fuck about technology and rocket scientists and other science behind it but when you have an astronaut in their fuckign suit where they can't even see a view finder (there was no view finder) and take photos of fucking amazing quality with the equipment they had I say it's fucking bullshit, they had no view finder, no autofocus and a pretty fucking wide lens which is fucking recipes for out of focus and under/over exposed photo's yet the fucking photos look tack sharp with a very small object in focus ... that is either fucking art or bullshit and I truly hope that before anyone makes a stupid comment they should take their SLR and turn it to manual, cover the view finder, turn autofocus off and take some family snaps, only then come back here and comment

You've only ever seen the good photos then. There's plenty of crappy ones. I'll try to find a link.

[Billzilla]

Here's a good example.



From Apollo 11.