Triton 4x2

[10sec rx7]

dont knock em till you have tried em dog, and ive tried all but the colarado

cheers just shoot me an sms

Will do

[RA45GTCelica]

before you buy check on how much the service is at each 10kay on the bt50. ford is at every 15 kay 1 service is 390 and the next is 600 ,it will just give you an idea of running costs etc
unless you are going to do your own service
then tell me to nick off

[Southo]

If you buy a BT-50 - please don't crash it..

have two friends with them, both are waiting 6-8 weeks for door skins after small bumps.

But, they both love them and wouldn't trade them for the world..

[GTREA]

BT50 should drive better than Colorado, good utes, just fucking ugly.

Why Mazda why!

Could've been a huge winner for them.

Ps theyll both drive worse than an Amarok

[10sec rx7]

unless you are going to do your own service

im defintaly not going to pay to get it serviced... lol

[10sec rx7]

Ps theyll both drive worse than an Amarok

couldnt care less, there is no way in hell i would buy a VW... i have enough trouble dealing with them twice a year when a customer brings one of there shit box VW's in with a problem..

[mc68]

Whoops... I thought Ranger was the go... BT50, Of course they are cheaper. No one wants one.
So, you don't think 7.5K is alot for 4WD?
The prices I quoted are supposed to be the manufacturer's list price

Fair bump, play on

Yeah I agree with you.. As much as they are so similar. The ranger looks about 7000000000x better.

And 7.5k is fairly reasonable I thought. Spose they can ask that these days. The 4wd is just as good if not better than the aging hilux. People paid more than that for SR5's... Where as the jews like me would pay 42k a Lifted 2wd. Purely for the towing aspect.

[10sec rx7]

Bt50 out.. Drove one with 15k on it and it drove fine but every plastic in the interior is fucked...

Just drive Colorado and it drives the same just nicer and more roomy inside,

Will go drive ranger now and make decision today

[GTREA]

Ranger outsells BT50 quite easily.

Top 10 Utes for growth – August 2012

1. Volkswagen Amarok – +416.5
2. Nissan Navara – +129.7
3. Holden Colorado – +118.9
4. Toyota HiLux – +70.8
5. Isuzu D-Max – +52.8
6. Mazda BT-50 – +43.9
7. Ford Ranger – +30.6
8. Mitsubishi Triton – +0.2
9. Nissan Patrol PU/CC – -7.5
10. Toyota Landcruiser PU/CC – -8.6

Top 10 Best-selling Utes – August 2012

1. Toyota HiLux – 4010
2. Nissan Navara – 2017
3. Ford Ranger – 1629
4. Holden Colorado – 1581
5. Mitsubishi Triton – 1400
6. Mazda BT-50 – 1003
7. Holden Utility – 778
8. Volkswagen Amarok – 750
9. Isuzu D-Max – 741
10. Toyota Landcruiser PU/CC – 650

[10sec rx7]

I don't care what out sells what.. If the inside is falling apart at 15k what's it going to be like at 100k

[GTREA]

Good for you

But post directed at question asked earlier, cant quote on iPhone

[10sec rx7]

just drove the ranger.. funny enough it drives like a BT50.. inside is heaps nicer than the Bt50, but still nothing on the holden.. the holden box shifts nicer,,

short ratio 6 speeds are pretty shit in a low revving diesel...

[ProVK]

I wish you could get a equiv of the navara v6 diesel and 7 speed auto on one of the more modern looking and appointed dual cabs. You don't get enough good stuff apart from engine/auto and some good tie downs in a navara for the 50k price tag.

[MartyHusseinXF]

Ps theyll both drive worse than an Amarok

yeah nope, nothing can drive worse than a tiny 2l baby turbo diesel in a 2t+ truck.

[GTREA]

Still trolling hard Marty I see