Originally posted by XFJET
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
XD Falcon..classic yet....or ever
Collapse
X
-
No, the XD has the better rear suspension. The upper trailing arms on the XE are way too short. This causes problems if a wheel hits a bump and with body roll, as the short arc pulls the wheel forward and makes the rear of the car steer. If you read articles of the period, when the XE Falcon was first raced most drivers parked their cars and refused to race them as they had such evil handling. If you look under a Group C XE Falcon, it's not uncommon to see leaf springs. The Group C cars that are running trailing arms are nothing like a standard XE Falcon. Dick Johnson's XE Falcon is a good example of this and there was a good write up about it in Australian Musclecar a few years back.Are you optimistic or pessimistic about the end of the world?
-
I doubt Aussie has much effect ... I think just because old car.Originally posted by Marco_VESS View PostI don't think they'll be a classic in the sense that someone will one day offer you $50k for one, but all old Aussie cars eventually end up with some level of desirability/collectability simply by being old Aussie cars.Soft roaders represent an excellent compromise between the needs of the hardcore 4x4 user and the convenience of a city hatchback. Its clear to see why they have become so popular in todays society.
Comment
-
Your average Camry these days probably has more fasts than a V8 (especially if only 302) and would handle and stop better and also get much better fuel economy. XD would be ok for towing I guess. Why do you want to buy this car?Originally posted by ALLMTR View PostXD Falcons, old/cool enough to be a classic? There is one for sale local, straight and V8....
Comment
-
Because Clevo.Originally posted by Falchoon View PostWhy do you want to buy this car?"Where can we get hold of a Vincent Black Shadow?" "Whats that?" "A fantastic bike," I said. "The new model is something like two thousand cubic inches, developing two hundred brake-horsepower at four thousand revolutions per minute on a magnesium frame with two styrofoam seats and a total curb weight of exactly two hundred pounds."
Comment
-
Surprised you dont get it, coming from someone who owned an XY GT rep?Originally posted by Falchoon View PostYour average Camry these days probably has more fasts than a V8 (especially if only 302) and would handle and stop better and also get much better fuel economy. XD would be ok for towing I guess. Why do you want to buy this car?
Comment
-
This and the fact that this is an awesome half lapOriginally posted by Gammaboy View PostBecause Clevo.
2017 Ford Ranger XLT (Jeep Wrangler recovery vehicle)
2007 KTM 250 SX
Originally posted by MonzaI've never considered myself the type of guy to eat arse but I am currently reviewing that policy
Comment
-
We're talking about non-collectible models though. Is a 3.6L base auto XT worth any more than a generic Alfa or Triumph or Lancia or Citroen sedan of the same age, if they're all in really good condition?Originally posted by exwrxex View PostCompare the price of Falcon GTs compared to US muscle ie Mustangs, Torinos, Galaxies etc etc. The US stuff is better value for money in Australia.
The fastest (stock) 351 XD's did low 15s quarters ... Aurion would smash one, and in fact isn't as for off a 351 GTHO as the 351 GTHO owner would hope.Originally posted by FalchoonYour average Camry these days probably has more fasts than a V8 (especially if only 302) and would handle and stop better and also get much better fuel economy. XD would be ok for towing I guess. Why do you want to buy this car?
Soft roaders represent an excellent compromise between the needs of the hardcore 4x4 user and the convenience of a city hatchback. Its clear to see why they have become so popular in todays society.
Comment
-
That's what happens when you have cars of similar weight and power except the Aurion has 2 more forward gears and is thirty years newer.Originally posted by Forg View PostThe fastest (stock) 351 XD's did low 15s quarters ... Aurion would smash one, and in fact isn't as for off a 351 GTHO as the 351 GTHO owner would hope.
2017 Ford Ranger XLT (Jeep Wrangler recovery vehicle)
2007 KTM 250 SX
Originally posted by MonzaI've never considered myself the type of guy to eat arse but I am currently reviewing that policy
Comment
-
351C in XD's day was only 150kW; I'd bet an XD has 3/4 the weight of an Aurion as well as 3/4 the power.Originally posted by Greg Rust View PostThat's what happens when you have cars of similar weight and power except the Aurion has 2 more forward gears and is thirty years newer.
Soft roaders represent an excellent compromise between the needs of the hardcore 4x4 user and the convenience of a city hatchback. Its clear to see why they have become so popular in todays society.
Comment
-
+1 and go 30 years before the XD - ie 1949 - and surprise surprise the XD would shit all over a ...a... ford customline sidevalve V8,Originally posted by Greg Rust View PostThat's what happens when you have cars of similar weight and power except the Aurion has 2 more forward gears and is thirty years newer.
amazing what the march of technology can do..
Comment

Comment