Missed the previous thread and this one seems to be solved but,
Indycar drivers (who use a h pattern) go straight to what ever gear they want cos it is faster. They change to the gear they want to come out of the corner in. Much quicker braking and like what has been said, they are on the threshold anyway so how can they brake any harder ??
This is proven when driving my car. I recently bloew a small hole in the diaphram in the brake booster so as a result I have non assisted brakes atm. (and the pedal feels so much nicer to drive with). I noticed after doing it that when I went down a gear you could feel the car pushing the brakes harder and hence had to brake harder to slow down. IN comparison to not using the engine to brake.
But, on do assume that, like what was said, using the engine to brake would be more efficient as you don't need to use the brakes as much. But is doing this worth the extra fuel and stress on the motor ... or should that be in another thread ???:D
Cheers
Jabber
Indycar drivers (who use a h pattern) go straight to what ever gear they want cos it is faster. They change to the gear they want to come out of the corner in. Much quicker braking and like what has been said, they are on the threshold anyway so how can they brake any harder ??
This is proven when driving my car. I recently bloew a small hole in the diaphram in the brake booster so as a result I have non assisted brakes atm. (and the pedal feels so much nicer to drive with). I noticed after doing it that when I went down a gear you could feel the car pushing the brakes harder and hence had to brake harder to slow down. IN comparison to not using the engine to brake.
But, on do assume that, like what was said, using the engine to brake would be more efficient as you don't need to use the brakes as much. But is doing this worth the extra fuel and stress on the motor ... or should that be in another thread ???:D
Cheers
Jabber

I hate Sequential shifts where up is up a gear..stupid.
Comment