If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
PF photographers show us your latest **not dial-up friendly**
I got my replacement camera back from the shop on ANZAC day, not 1 hot pixel. Pretty happy about that.
I always thought the tollerance on hot pixels was only with LCD screens (thats been my experience at work with flat panel LCD's that have had a few, but if you whinge enough they will replace em) the fact that the CCD had a hot pixel straight out of the box on the old camera annoyed me, hence returning it. The guy at the shop agreed.
If only it didnt rain most of the long weekend i might have got out and taken some decent pictures.
Typical first day back at work and its perfect weather outside!!
I'll have some photos soon to share!
By the way, awesome photos sejanus, et al.
:worship:
Originally posted by smee In regards to the hot pixel, most manufacturers will state that it is within tolerance so will not warranty it.
I bought a Nikon Coolpix 775 (from a MTB friend at Maxell) for under $400 because it had a hot pixel. He stated that most shops returned the couple of these cameras due to the hot pixel error, but would palm them off if they could to unsuspecting buyers.
I got the camera, a 2 times converter lens and the charger/mains supply unit plus a 64 Mb card for less then the RRP of the camera. I thought it was a good buy and was happy to put up with a hot pixel.
I wasn't watching any times really, and I was only there for a part of the morning.
stang,
Panning with the car at shutter speeds of around 1/125 to 1/200 (depending on speed) keeps the car fairly sharp with the background blurred. The images do get sharpened in photoshop, but thats more because I set my camera to shoot with no sharpening than to increase the sharpening of the car itself....if that makes any sense
It's very hard to smoothly pan with a long lens (500mm) at slow shutter speeds like that, getting camera shake in the image is very easy to do. I managed to do the below picture at 1/80th of a second at 500mm length, you can see the blurring looks way better at the slow shutter speed, but it's a real hit and miss affair to get the image sharp at those speeds.
I still need more practice with panning, a few months ago I did a shoot for my pastor after he finished restoring his 1919 Henderson motorbike. I did about 10 shots of flypasts, only 1 or 2 turned out sharp. This was using a 300mm lens at around 60th/90th.
I was using a tripod, it was kind of awkward swivelling around with it though. Ah well, the JMS drift competition's coming up next weekend, that'll give me a chance to work on my panning technique
Comment