Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Sequential gearshift in production car?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    That shifter looks craptastic.

    There would be far easier pulrley mechanical ways to translate a sequential type movement into a H pattern type movement
    www.DRIVENFX.com Performance Engine Building, Auto Electrical (Wiring Looms, ECU Installs, Diganoses and Repair), Custom Automotive Electronics, Car Preparation, Car Setup, Trackside Services,

    PM me for more info

    Comment


      #17
      Originally posted by niscort
      :O

      Im thinking there is an issue with shifting to 'N' from any other gear than '1'... meaning you dont slip into 'N' between gears
      thats why you hold the clutch down, it'd essentially put it in a neutral state

      | 1963 RK43 Toyota Lite-Stout (Stanley) | 2002 EC5W Mitsubishi Legnum VR-4 Type-S (Larry) |



      Originally posted by Gammaboy
      PF - We're not happy till you're not happy.

      Comment


        #18
        Most bikes have a wet clutch too (not ducati though) which allows you to more progressively slip the clutch without damaging it.

        Not sure what the advantage would be in having a seq shift if you still had to use the pedal. Bike boxes are designed to not use the clutch on an upchange at least...

        Basically a bike gearbox runs along one shaft, & a car one uses several. Its due to the size of the bits & the layout & packaging that they are not the same.
        http://www.larryscustomcycles.com.au

        Comment


          #19
          One of Ford's AU concept cars a few years ago used a Harrop sequential mechanism on a Tremec manual AFAIK. It was painted in Mexican Fire by PPG too - very schmick.
          A slow day at the track is better than any day in the office.

          Comment


            #20
            I think you will find that it was a harrop box. You can buy them fairly easily if youve got $20k or so. Quite a few GTRs in Melb run them. They are a pretty angry thing though being sequential dog boxes...not something your going to want to drive every day
            http://www.larryscustomcycles.com.au

            Comment


              #21
              ok, draaaaaging this up from a looong time ago i know...

              but really, how hard could it be to make up a sequential shifter

              the Ikeya one, rather than stated above and in many forums, DOES shift into neutral between gears.
              it is basically a standard lower half of gearstick with a tricky upper half. watching the vids on their site, it specifically shows going into neutral between shifts....

              but anyway, with a bit of modification to an extension housing, a change in shift rods, and whacking in a shift barrel, how hard could it be for a budding engineer to make one up?

              ideas and thoughts? (for RWD, "normal" gearboxes)

              the Ikeya one looks ok, but could be prone to a bit of sloppiness due to extra linkages... the barrel shift mod requires a fair bit more effort...

              Cya, Stewart
              "I'm a retarded Doctor, not a retarded Mechanic"

              Comment


                #22
                Golfgti
                Grant Morrisons

                Comment


                  #23
                  the DSG is interesting, but i can't see myself adapting it to a toyota W5X, or T50 box in the near future
                  "I'm a retarded Doctor, not a retarded Mechanic"

                  Comment


                    #24
                    Doug Nash (Richmond Gear) make a vertical gate shifter that goes forward 1st, back for 2nd, forward for third, back for fourth, forward for fifth.

                    Can't downshift without going back to 1st though. Looks hell tough but:D

                    http://store.summitracing.com/partde...5&autoview=sku

                    Comment


                      #25
                      Does anyone know of anyone with one of these sequential shifters in Melbourne? And would any of them be in a position to have time/lack of sense to allow me to dismantle one to see the inner workings?

                      FWIW, they'd (probably without exception) 'all' go to N between each gear. the difference would likely be that you can't 'keep' it in N, as it won't complete the full travel of teh ratchet/upper lever (and hence the entire mechanism) until it's engaged into the gear about to be selected. I'd be surprised if any actually had a 'usable' N between each gear. But I'll happily stand corrected.
                      John McKenzie

                      Science flies people to the moon.
                      Religion flies people into buildings.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X