V8 / Pushrod
Just a comment to about the vvti, other tech to make a small engine
perform.
V8's dont exactly need VVTi from my experience.
With a 5.0 litre holden engine in a kingswood, with a 3.08:1 DIFF ratio and even lower at one stage (2.78:1) big hydraulic cam (range 3k-6k)
I was still having traction problems from 1200rpm, so 'extra' low end torque
from variable valve timing doesn't matter at all. Also i think it helps with
economy by comprimising cylinder filling (bad VE at low rpm's would be degrading cylinder filling (by a guess) to about 60% (3 litres). Which is perfect
in my book... at 3k when the cam is happy, that's my vvti!
Economy was great, as well as performance.
The introduction of D/OHC often went hand in hand with other radical head design changes etc, which makes a false belief that that is where the extra
perfromanace comes from.
Ie, compare a VN v8 (injected 5.0) to a kingswood 308 (5.0)..
What's the difference? EFI?? no... heads that flow 450hp standard.
Most people credit the EFI for the increase in power, it's just the
massivly improved head design.
I've said it before, to sum up one of these arguements:
There is no substitute for cubic inches for making power.
(Boost isn't, since you just boost the bigger engine too)
Bigger isn't always better though, the engines must suit the requirements of the car. Ie, 550cu in a mini might be a bit overkill..
We are all running on the internal combustion engine that was invented in
the 18'th century. UNTIL SOMEONE CREATES A CAMLESS ENGINE, EVERYONE IS JUST AGRUEING ABOUT THE SAME THING!! CAMS OPEN VALVES!! HOW
THEY DO IT IS IRREVELENT!!!!!! HONESTLY IT IS!!!
go nuts rotor boys
Just a comment to about the vvti, other tech to make a small engine
perform.
V8's dont exactly need VVTi from my experience.
With a 5.0 litre holden engine in a kingswood, with a 3.08:1 DIFF ratio and even lower at one stage (2.78:1) big hydraulic cam (range 3k-6k)
I was still having traction problems from 1200rpm, so 'extra' low end torque
from variable valve timing doesn't matter at all. Also i think it helps with
economy by comprimising cylinder filling (bad VE at low rpm's would be degrading cylinder filling (by a guess) to about 60% (3 litres). Which is perfect
in my book... at 3k when the cam is happy, that's my vvti!
Economy was great, as well as performance.
The introduction of D/OHC often went hand in hand with other radical head design changes etc, which makes a false belief that that is where the extra
perfromanace comes from.
Ie, compare a VN v8 (injected 5.0) to a kingswood 308 (5.0)..
What's the difference? EFI?? no... heads that flow 450hp standard.
Most people credit the EFI for the increase in power, it's just the
massivly improved head design.
I've said it before, to sum up one of these arguements:
There is no substitute for cubic inches for making power.
(Boost isn't, since you just boost the bigger engine too)
Bigger isn't always better though, the engines must suit the requirements of the car. Ie, 550cu in a mini might be a bit overkill..
We are all running on the internal combustion engine that was invented in
the 18'th century. UNTIL SOMEONE CREATES A CAMLESS ENGINE, EVERYONE IS JUST AGRUEING ABOUT THE SAME THING!! CAMS OPEN VALVES!! HOW
THEY DO IT IS IRREVELENT!!!!!! HONESTLY IT IS!!!
go nuts rotor boys

, but I bet it will
Comment