Originally posted by Mrs Jones
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
carb vs efi camshaft
Collapse
X
-
It's one of the things that determines valve timing events… I always look at when selecting a cam. It can have a major effect on how a cam performs. The same lobes on a 106 LSA compared to 112 is going to have noticible effect on rpm range, torque and idle quality. Along with durations it's a really quick indicator of what characteristics a cam is going to haveOriginally posted by RVK 355Hold it flat cunt
Comment
-
Nope. Car came with an angry cam (stroked 351W with stock heads, real ugly combo), it has lots of over lap etc and has very little vacuum (5inches) at idle. But I likes the sound of it and want to make it work....Originally posted by greenhj View Posti hope none of you guys are selecting a cam based on LSA...
Comment
-
What carby and manifold? You might need some other bits to make it happenOriginally posted by mizone View PostNope. Car came with an angry cam (stroked 351W with stock heads, real ugly combo), it has lots of over lap etc and has very little vacuum (5inches) at idle. But I likes the sound of it and want to make it work....Originally posted by RVK 355Hold it flat cunt
Comment
-
funny you say that. guy from texas speed got back to me, he suggested that ms4 cam but ground on 109 or 110 lsa (239/242 .649"/.609") which they'd do for free.Originally posted by Mrs Jones View PostReally you're best bet is to chose something proven. You're not at the level where you're chasing one or two horsepower. Even that Texas speed cam that you were talking about being compromised design, if it's running 140+ mph in a car it's working and will probably do what you want at least as a start point. If you develop a good benchmark with something like that you can experiment later and see what you lose or gainOriginally posted by 50RTDDave, have you uploaded the data from the carby?
Comment

Comment