If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
There is really no hard and fast rule when it comes to modded engines and nitrous use, ie, if you have a bulletproof bottom end, you could see 500hp ... Though when talking about stock or mildly modified engines, what Feenix said is correct, work on the 50% rule.
That red cortina with the six in it (EFI and Nitrous) would have to be making over 500hp to run the high nines that it does!
(it also frequents the off street meets at AIR)
about the falcon 34adm carby... they go onto the 202 (black) easly no mods? where abouts could i pick one of these up, im in canberra and how much are they worth?
I've played the old-school engine game, and I've formed the conclusion that it is one of the easiest ways to spend a lot of money on making your car a complete pain to drive....
What I want is a nice modern 4 valve per cylinder DOHC motor with individual throttle body fuel injection and a 9000rpm capable valvetrain/bottom end... and I can probably have it for less money than my old 'old-school' motor would cost to make 25% less power... sad really... or alternatively, I go the forced induction route... oh, did I mention what I buying with my tax cheque?
Don't worry, thats just the self-preservation instinct, in my experience you can safely ignore it.
there not built for racin from factory
But Ive seen a genuin 220 Kw naturally aspirated injected 202 ( the 6 throttle bodies where a bitch to tune though and it takes alot a high qual parts
sounded absolutely awsome
it required quite alot a head work balancing, a rather aggressive cam and valve gear and other stuff to ( dont wanto go into it got things to do )
revved to 8500 Rpm and was just drivable
I think this is about as far as U can get them B4 there shit to drive on the road, very loud to ( but it sounded awesome enough not to care )
Linx, while your post (I believe) was in defence of 'old school' motors... it basically summed up my problem with them, you get to spend a whole bunch of $$$ rectifying design flaws and end up with an inferior product.
Imagine if that same money had been spent on a naturally aspirated 2JZ? Individual throttle bodies, porting, cams, custom exhaust, engine management... no reason not to expect 350hp at 8500rpm, day in, day out... totally streetable.
Don't worry, thats just the self-preservation instinct, in my experience you can safely ignore it.
I used to be a bit against a Buick v6 and opted for a Nissan powered VL as the v6 has the stigma attached to it for being a rough jurrasic engine.
From my experience,whoever says these engines are crap doesn't know what they are talking about,we have 2 Commodore v6's,if well cared for the VN is not too bad but still not a silky smooth engine,we also have a VX and it is smooth as,cannot hear or feel it run so anyone who says they are crap are misinformed.
Any Buick V6 can be made to run more like this with a proper crankshaft balance (was a problem in the VS Commodores) and a good engine management reprogram to smooth the idle out.
These engines can turn a Commodore into a lethal weapon once turboed,they achieve 11 second quarters in the states in the Buick Regals & Grand nationals.
They have bigger capacity enignes than the 3.8 yes but go to the Buick website http://www.gnttype.org/techarea/recipes/9secrec.html ,it shows a 231 cubic inch V6 (3.8 litre) bored to 234 c.i which puts out a "9 second quarter time".
If you're not a diehard GMH fan, I reckon the cheapest way to get 12s out of an NA I6 would probably be to go a Hemi 265 (with a bit of work) in a Centura.
Comment